BOOKMARK, COMMENT, ORGANIZE, SEARCH

IT'S SIMPLE AND IT WORKS

Popular Categories

software (9409)
internet (9250)
business (8210)
online (6824)
health (6764)
free (5978)
home (5803)
news (5665)
tools (5066)
web (4913)
web2.0 (4201)
game (4149)
& (3840)
shopping (3790)
social (3616)
games (3516)
golf (3451)
default (3376)
blog (3205)
search (3120)
design (3102)
arizona (3094)
music (2910)
lasvegas (2880)
mortgage (2856)
myrtlebeach (2855)
golfswing (2852)
golfclubs (2851)
desktop (2843)
credit (2819)
windows (2726)
download (2700)
mp3 (2606)
file (2502)
management (2450)
screen (2440)
bookmarks (2394)
video (2374)
security (2321)
money (2251)
loans (2243)
loan (2223)
screensaver (2159)
utilities (2150)
email (2118)
education (2104)
image (1968)
debt (1942)
finance (1915)
to (1907)

Commercial Joint Ventures Under English Law - Practical Considerations

by Christian S Browne

posted in Legal

Syndicate This Article
Commercial joint ventures are essentially contractual in nature. A commercial contract such as a collaboration contract or a research and development contract underpins the venture.
The terms are contained in the contract. Therefore it is very important to clearly define the rights and obligations of the parties at an early stage and to include those provisions in the contract. This reduces the risk or misinterpretation of the terms of the collaboration.
The contract should address the following matters:
1. It is very important to clearly define the scope of the collaboration and the respective party's rights and obligations. If it relates to the development of a product and/ or service then it is important to clearly define the scope of the development and each party's input into the development process.
2. The parties should identify any background intellectual property rights ("Background IPR") which they have already developed prior to the joint venture but which they propose to use in the future development of the product and/ or service. In general each party will retain exclusive ownership of their respective Background IPR. The parties will then need to determine upon what terms the Background IPR can be used by the other partner both during the period of development and also after it has been completed.
3. The intellectual property developed during the period of the collaboration is generally called foreground intellectual property ("Foreground IPR"). It is very important for the parties to determine what Foreground IPR will be developed and whether any or all of the Foreground IPR will be jointly owned or exclusively owned by the party developing it. If the Foreground IPR is exclusively owned by either party then the other party would generally expect to receive a licence of such Foreground IPR to enable it to exploit it both during the period of the collaboration and possibly afterwards.
4. It is also important to include confidentiality obligations on each party. Both parties will generally disclose their own confidential information to the other to aid the collaborative process. Therefore the party that receives such confidential information should only be able to use and/ or disclose such confidential information in accordance with certain defined parameters. This will protect each party's information.
5. The collaboration agreement should clearly define the duration of the joint venture and also grounds upon which each party can terminate it early. The term of the project should be until such time as the development has been completed. In general the contract can be terminated early/ prior to conclusion of the project where for instance either party is in material breach of the terms of the contract, or where a party is in repeated breach of the contract, or alternatively where a party enters some form of insolvency process.
6. The collaboration agreement should also state what happens in the event that the contract is terminated early upon one of the grounds specified in point 5 above. In such circumstances, both parties should retain all their respective Background IPR and any licence to the other party would generally terminate. Any Foreground IPR would be owned by the party developing it and any Foreground IPR developed by the parties jointly would be jointly owned.
About the Author: The author, Christian Browne is a business solicitor and the Managing Director of Summerfield Browne Solicitors http://www.summerfieldbrowne.com. Christian Browne is also a legal advisor with the Institute of Directors in London.

Newest Articles in Legal

Other articles by Christian S Browne